Strength of Gravity [inversely proportional] to the Speed of Light
I will begin propounding my various ideas of Theoritical Physics. I am not a physicist by profession. I most certainly am not a Mathematician. BUT, I am an abstractionist. These are some thoughts that I have been playing around with in my mind for a few years. I decided that its better that I have them written down and witnessed now, before I find 20 years down the line scientists suddenly waking up to my ideas!
We know JUST how simple E=mc2 really is. I believe that the rules of the Universe would be able to be described in around 2-3 simple formula’s, rather than a single formula. I believe I have been Blessed with an insight into some of the details of that which there are those who are dedicating their whole lives to - the movement in search of the GUT[Grand Unification Theory]. My ideas are rather esoteric and may not be readily understood, but, they are simple abstract concepts based on the rules that we already know; Unfortunately, I am afraid they may be oversimplifications, and thus, the purpose of these posts(I’m looking for comments from the rest of y’all on in|validating the suggestions I’ve presented.). To begin with:
Einstein was infatuated by light.
I’m infatuated by gravity, black holes, and making fun of people who like strings(and their useless theory).
I would like to begin by suggesting the following:
The Strength of Gravity is inversely proportional to the Speed of Light.
which means:
If the Speed of Light Increases, Gravity decreases.
If the Speed of Light Decreases, Gravity increases.
But the Speed of Light is Constant?
Yes, but, what happens when you keep the rules[formulas\equations] and the determined constants the same - in relation to the others[outputs of those formulas\equations] - when you DO change the speed of light? What are the results of the formulas of physics when you start changing the value of the constant in relation to some of the other established information; ie., time, distance, & gravity.
There’s no supporting evidence???
I think black holes provide evidence. Nice place for gravity, time, mass, and the speed of light to change, eh. It’s all relative.
An article I read today and its implications to what I’ve Suggested: Einstein was right: space and time bend
The article suggests that space\time bends, as the evidence seen in observations. This means, the speed of light stays constant, so when space[ie., distance] changes, the time to travel the distance directly changes proportionately. That seems to be breaking a few rules. What about the effect of gravity, and, at the same time, the effect ON gravity?Is it not possible to view things, just a slight bit differently; As the effect of gravity causes the geodetic effect, the Constant[Speed of Light] changes inversely in relation to it, and thus, distance and time bend.
All of this requires detailing, which will be done as I continue to reveal additional basics of my understandings. I’m just wording things out, so that someone can point out to me that the things I’m saying are just plain wrong and I can stop believing that I’ve understood something truely vast and awesome and apply those brain cells to other tasks. Or, they keep presenting me problems, which help clarify a correct understanding. As an abstractionist, very detailed concepts will be built on various simple posts which will all fit together over the period of time. As my understanding gets more fine tuned, it will allow me\us to correct any mistakes that have been made, thereby leading us correctly and sooner, to a conclusion.
5 Comments
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
Leave a comment
Thanks for the comment! Regardless if its only a metaphor, it still messes with my mind
But you provide a great summary of it!
Hello Matthew.
Like yourself, I am infatuated by gravity. My obsession started years ago with the thought that gravity was less at the time of big creatures- namely dinosaurs. I’ve conjured up four possible events that could possibly explain this change.
The one that interests me the most is the recent- relatively so- annoucement that the universe is expanding- yes- but that the expansion is speeding up! Could that have possibly effected the constant of light? I think we can all agree that nothing is constant but change. Einstein’s example of the elevator is my favorite- what really is the speed.
Some have said the idea that creates the most derision, the most ridicule- that’s the one with the most promise. Good luck with this and keep on thinking. Ed Myers
a lot of dinosaurs were small…
A lot of mammals that came much later were big, but they have nearly all become extinct.
illiterate cretin
no pax
no God
bloody /you/
scattering is inversely proportional to speed
gravity affects velocity/direction
there /are/ two time dimensions
I found this page through the response of Shree Mulay’s Oct. 12, 2007, 3:47 pm post in the Telegraph.co.uk web forum on “Are We Missing A Dimension of Time”. But I was initially directed here through a group discussion on the site Blackplanet.com (The Group name is “SCIENTIFIC- FROM EVOLUTION TO STRING THEORY”).
I find this subject very interesting. As a novice to particle physics, I am quite inquisitive of how the world works, and how reality can be perceived in so many different ways. But I do not comfortably understand gravity. Or how it would play in the ideas you present. But something you said, regarding speed made me think of the recent news I heard about the moon moving away from the earth at approx. 2 inches a year.
If the moon’s gravitational pull has an effect on the earth’s rotation, then the gradual distancing of the moon from the earth would alter the rate at which the earth spins…is that a correct line of thinking, or am I missing a crucial component in my amateur analysis of this? If that is the case, then wouldn’t the altered rate at which the earth spins effect our perception of reality (or our available perception and recognition of a different dimension)?
Again, I know very little, and I pretty much suck at math, so I may be missing the point. Either way, I find your thoughts to be interesting. I appreciate you sharing this knowledge openly. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. What you are doing is important.
Here is a link to the discussion forum held on blackplanet, that - ultimately, lead me to read your information.
http://www.blackplanet.com/groups/forum_thread.html?comment_form_submit=1&group_id=3952&cmt_collection_id=497868&message_ids=&p=1&collection_id=497868&ordering=oldest+first
Thanks.
:Taylor
(Chromeangel)
West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, USA.